NURSING
TELEMACHUS
AND COMPUTERS
INTRODUCTION
The aims of this 'dialogue' are
threefold. First, simply to explore through the minds and voices of
two ancient characters, contemporary nursing informatics and
telematics issues. Secondly, to test the viability of the dialogue as
an alternative format to the usual academic paper. And thirdly, to
introduce unfamiliar readers (students?) to 'the' master of the
dialogue form - Plato.
Readers may (hopefully) be stimulated to
seek out Plato's works, which are freely available in affordable
paperback editions. 'The Last Days of Socrates' is recommended as a
starting point. Plato captures in the dialogues the technique employed
by Socrates, that still bears his name - 'Socratic questioning'.
As health professionals search for ways
to reassert values amid unprecedented technical and social change,
philosophy is once more on the agenda. This attempted 'dialogue' has
two protagonists. Telemachus, who is in name from Homer's Odyssey and
other Hellenic literature. The name appeals to me here due to the
study of 'tele'-matics, a key branch of informatics research.
Epictetus (50-120A.D.) was a philosopher
of the stoic school. Sometimes we find unexpected connections in
things, as with Epictetus: nursing - health - ethics/values -
philosophy - Enchiridion (Manual) health - how to live ones life -
leadership - 3,000 drachmas paid for E.'s lamp after his death -
Florence Nightingale - nursing!
Telemachus is a student of the Academy
established by Aristotle, starting his third year of nurse training.
Epictetus is staged as a professor, a member of the faculty for
health. With apologies...
 |
It is high summer.
A beautiful morning waits to greet the citizens of
Athens, but not all.
Epictetus, his robes flowing is just about to leave the
academy, when he spies a student. |
EPICTETUS: My word
Telemachus, what problem fastens you to the library's desks on such a
fine day? Surely you know that body and mind need balanced proportions
of sunlight, air, good food, wine and company?
TELEMACHUS: Yes Epictetus
I recognize the good and beneficial things that I miss, but I have a
complex problem, that I would be grateful to discuss with you?
E: Surely, and with
pleasure, but not here. I fear we are already attracting disdain, come
let us go outside....
This problem then - I assume it is connected with your current
studies in caring for the people?
T: It is. The problem is
caused by external forces. A machine not of war, although that must be
a possibility someday, but a machine of the mind. A machine more
powerful than the abacus and the Oracle at Delphi combined. You know
of this I am sure?
|
E: Yes. And debated
much about the capacity of these machines to "think"
like men.
T: The machine is
called a 'computer'. They wish to use the machine to solve
problems in nursing. Problems of resource management initially,
with the promise of solutions to clinical problems with benefits
for patient care too. In order to answer the questions, the
problems must be described logically. The problem then is to
capture what nursing is about? |
 |
E:Ah. If only you could
capture this essence of nursing and bottle it. And what are your
thoughts thus far Telemachus?
T: Well it seems to me
that it is one thing to describe the angles and proportions of the
squares of a triangle as our arithmeticians do so well. Or even to
list the antidotes to snake bites; or balms for sunburn and chapped
hands. But caring for people, this is a problem of another order.
E: Why do you find it so?
No, do not look so surprised Telemachus. If you want my help I insist
you consider the question. Let us humour each other.
T: Well, as you know,
nursing seems so much a matter of administering good food, wine,
sunshine, fresh air, and treatments in the correct proportions. We do
X to achieve Y, but it is not so straight forward. After scratching
the surface I am faced with complexity and cussedness. The managers,
indeed our whole state is suddenly obsessed with information. An
obsession beyond the weekly events at Delphi, as the machine processes
data.
E: How does this cause a
problem?
T: Nurses use data that is
true. How many stab wounds, broken ribs, and bruises. How far a man
should be able to march, how much water a woman is capable of
carrying. Data - as in a number - is just a number when the context is
removed, but nurses use information. Computers cannot handle
information. It remains...
E: Please! Hold on a
second, why not information?
T: Computers are designed
to process a sequence of data. Although to us they process
information, they are not designed for that task. You're still not
convinced? Well, if they wanted a computer to - say, understand a
scene, we humans have a distinct advantage. The programmer has to
break up the scene into (data) elements for processing. But people can
deal with patterns, integrating the data in the scene as a whole,
without seemingly thinking about it. In reality I suppose we must, but
there it is.
E: Mm, I see! Carry on
then.
T: Where was I? Oh yes.
The powers that be are uncertain of just how far they wish to code the
activities of nursing, and I must add medical activities. The nurses
resent their care being reduced to quantities like some Pythagorian
exercise. Nursing is more than the sum of several numbers. So much
information is lost. The clerks do not help. It's as if no one knows
whether we should count the number of buckets, or the number of grains
of sand in the buckets that we carry. As you know Epictetus health
itself is very complex.
E: I see. So if I have
heard and understood, you are saying that nursing is not just about
quantity, the managers must decide how far to reduce nursing. To do
this they must wrestle with our friend complexity. Perhaps we too,
should indulge ourselves at this point? Please Telemachus - help me
recover my knowledge of health matters.
T: How shall I do that?
E: If health is complex
then there must be numerous ways to account for the complexity you
find Telemachus. What do Plato and Socrates say on the matter?
T: Well, some aspects of
health are given by the Gods, some by men themselves.
E: So do we have a choice
in being a patient?
T: The answer must be yes
and no. Yes, when a man's over indulgence leads to problems, as when
he over eats or drinks to excess. And no, when the Gods intervene,
affecting the quality of life of many people. Our saving thought, as
Plato taught, is that we can lose our sight, go mad, lose a leg. But
the Gods smile upon us as long as we retain our virtue. For an unjust
man has truly lost everything.
E: So when does a person become a patient?
T: Well, I can call upon
Aristotle for help.
E: Mm Telemachus, you
realize the merits of the living are controversial, how does a
contemporary help us?
T: Aristotle's four causes
could be useful? Let me see, yes, in this instance they can be used as
'becauses.' First the material cause. Patients become patients by
virtue of the substances they are made of. They break bones, cut their
skin. Sadly some of us literally lose our minds. The formal cause can
account for the way babies grow to adulthood and, if we are fortunate
we gradually wither in old age and die. Sometimes development is
arrested or interrupted in some way. Then there is the efficient
cause, we become ill if we do not eat good food. A warm safe
environment with exercise of mind and body, will push us towards a
state of positive health. Finally Aristotle speaks of telos, the
ultimate goal, or the teleological cause. Here humans and other
creatures move relentlessly towards their mature state, usually to
ensure propagation of the species.
E: I must admit that is a
useful tool, to get at the 'what' of health. Since we are preoccupied
in personalities, Telemachus, a further question. If health were
personified Telemachus, who would health be?
T: Why, that is easy. No
single person, indeed no person, as we think of at all. I would have
to say that health would simultaneously be Hercules; Helen and
Socrates.
E: Ah, good, well
remembered Telemachus. So you are saying that if nothing else health
is strength; beauty; and wisdom. You have paid attention, but let's
get back on track. Why is health suddenly a concern of the senate
then?
T: There is the health of
our democracy. How health care can be financed. Health is also fitness
to vote. A democracy cannot exist without its citizens. Furthermore,
they must codify how we nurses care for people, so that the clerks can
compute and process cost information. Despite the news from Marathon
the counsel are checking the treasury. A prolonged campaign upsets the
balance of demand and supply. Not least of the true citizens who can
use a sword.
E: So you must not only
reconcile the world of nursing and that of information, but politics
too? My, if only Plato or Socrates were at hand. At this juncture it
seems we need an example to wrestle with. Can you provide us with one?
T: I was afraid you would
ask, but I shall try. A man breaks a bone in his lower leg, he can no
longer walk for many weeks. His family must offer what support they
can and try to do his work for him. At first glance it appears this
problem is physical, but the man is affected in other ways. Not being
able to go to work depresses him. He feels useless and becomes
argumentative with family and friends. The physicians are subjected to
his curses, why he is worse than old Xanthipe. He consults with one
after another, seeking what - only the oracle knows. He can no longer
freely wander to listen to the debates in the agora, partake in the
baths, or games.
E: Yes, certainly, this
would be so, but I fail to see where the problem is? Surely such a
reaction is normal? A broken vine cannot carry the grapes. Have you
never thrown a pot, or cursed those you love when your freedom is
restricted for whatever reason?
T: Thrown a pot, yes - in
more ways than one, but I leave the cursing to the players. If I am to
code the activities undertaken both to describe the problem, and to
make the man better where do I start? I can record many aspects, but
these latter experiences of the man confound me. Perhaps the problem
is intractable, of such a nature that it is best left alone. Nursing
is not mathematics.
 |
E: You disappointment
me Telemachus. This is not like you. Surely your mentors will
appreciate your efforts in understanding the problem even if you
cannot solve it. Please answer me this - what is your course
called?
T: Nursing
informatics.
E: Expand each word
for me, but do not think too deeply Telemachus. Quickly now, do
not hesitate, while we find some shade. |
T: Nursing is that
discipline whose adherents care for people in need. Need in the sense
that they cannot look after themselves. Using scientific knowledge and
practical skills they help patients balance the humors of the body and
mind. Informatics is the study and management of information, and the
application of computing machinery in health care.
E: Is nursing a science as
your definitions would suggest?
T: Yes, but also one of
the caring arts.
E: One of the caring arts?
Both an art and science then - intriguing to say the least.
T: There are those who "think
nursing", their heads virtually in the clouds. Producing models
of nursing, nursing theories...
E: Indeed! And I thought
only philosophers nursed theories. Sorry Telemachus, pray continue.
T: Many lack insight into
the things they teach, in a way far removed from the everyday problems
of their discipline, like armchair astronomers. Others who practice do
so with their heads in the sand, they do not know what their hands are
doing, other than trying to follow the dictates of sun and stars.
Apparently there is a new model in mental health. It uses the
selenographic co-longitude of the sun on the moon.
E: Goodness. Why - that
sounds very scientific. You must tell me more?
T: The sun affects the
terminator apparently, although some of the terms are alien to me?
E: Well perhaps I can sum
up this particular model for you. When you next assess someone
Telemachus ask yourself - is it a full moon tonight?
T: Oh! I fear have been
made a fool of!
E: Not at all, I won't
tell a soul, but remember human activity is not just about terms, but
how we use them. What of the other nurses?
T: The rest; well they do
so heads bowed. Bowed in distrust and disillusionment. Yes, they try
to manage change, looking left, looking right, one eye on the patient,
one on the past, and one on future - which is obviously an impossible
state of affairs. Those skilled in the caring arts are at risk of
forgetting who they are.
E: Morale, aside
Telemachus, tell me what is this art to you?
T: Art? I would say it is
a both a skill to be developed, that is learned, and one a gift from
the Gods. Passed from generation to generation.
E: The physicians and
chemists are similar are they not? They have to learn skills, and
their dexterity in handling the aches, breaks and stresses of bones
young and old are born within them. So doctoring is both a science and
an art? And nursing is the same?
T: No. I think not. There
are similar features, a midwife must know of anatomy and physiology,
but at a different level to the physician. Also the proportions of
knowledge are different. The doctor is concerned with the herbs and
abstinence that will cure an ailment. The nurse with the persons'
response to the treatment. Am I making sense?
E: Yes, you are doing
well, for someone who claims he has a problem.
T: I can best sum up the
situation by observing that what aptitude is to the arithmeticians, so
attitude is to the nurse. The desire to care must come first.
E: Once again well
observed, the physicians still often lack in bedside manner. But this
knowledge that nurses must use, tell me more?
T: But that I could!
E: Well tell me what makes
it different from the medical arts?
T: The main thing must be
the contact the nurse has with her charge.
E: And the consequence of
this?
T: The two must get to
know each other, even better than physician and patient. The nurse has
constant care, the medic may visit occasionally. Unless of course a
fall or kick from a horse has sent the patient to some realm of the
Gods? Then the attention may be continuous, by both nurse and
physician, at least initially.
|
E: So what does the
nurse actually need to aid such constant contact with the patient?
T: Patience,
understanding, empathy, confidence, practice with proper training.
E: What of knowledge?
|
 |
T: That is the root of the
problem.
E: And so you must find
the branches. How they grow, how are they fed, how pliable to the wind
and other elements. Knowledge disposes us to act in certain ways. Your
personality in turn determines what information is deemed significant.
T: As ever, eloquently put
mentor.
E: Tell me how are these
caring arts delivered to a person in need?
T: If for example, they
are semi-mobile, then supervision or assistance to transfer from a to
b is a key task.
E: How do you decide that
mobility is the problem?
T: Why - from the facts
before my eyes? The patient's explanation of cause and effect. The
fundamental thread from cues to inferences, from inferences to
problems. It is true our eyes can deceive us, but there are no oars in
water here.
E: So what name would you
give to the process by which you derive the problems in need of
caring.
T: Various terms are used
- 'assessment' being the most common; 'information gathering';
'evaluation' - there are several.
|
E: You mentioned
evaluation. Is evaluation the same as assessment?
T: No. At least not if
the stages of problem solving are adhered to.
E: And they are?
T:Assessment;
Planning; Intervention; and Evaluation. The four stages are
reiterated with the problems identified in assessment, care
planned in stage two, intervention in the third, with the outcome
evaluated finally. |
E: The assessment is
repeated then?
T: No, not completely.
Evaluation focuses on the problems initially identified. At first
encounter the assessment is thorough, as common sense would dictate.
The assessments that follow this may not be so thorough.
E: So Telemachus are you
saying that any further assessment is in some way inferior?
T: No. Certainly not. We
must identify the patient's variance from the usual path that patients
take. It is different, in the sense that to repeat the first
assessment might duplicate much effort.
E: Let me go back to
comparing assessment and evaluation. What is evaluation? Or let me
rephrase that question. What do you do when you evaluate someone's
care?
T: Well you must look at
the problems. Are they still relevant? Are the priorities correct?
E: Why do that?
T: In-between initial
assessment and evaluation a care plan is devised, the problems having
been identified. Then the care plan is implemented. We need to ask if
the interventions are still appropriate? So we must look at outcomes.
To find out what results have our nursing actions produced?
|
E: But without
'reassessing' you cannot get at the outcomes.
T: That is true I
suppose. We go back to the original assessment and revise it, in
the light of new information.
E: Is there any other
way to describe these assessments that might at the same time
account for their difference?
T: The first is
influenced by the fact that the nurse is getting to know the
patient. In that sense it is a formal assessment. Subsequent
assessment is both formal and informal. Is that a help? |

|
E: Yes, Telemachus. At
least we can see the pieces of the broken pot, now the fog has cleared
a little. So if I have it right, you have just explained the social
context of assessments. What other contexts are there? Tell me what
names would you give to describe these assessments?
T: As practice currently
dictates initial and subsequent.
E: Is this initial
assessment much studied by other caring practitioners?
T: Only rarely. They tend
to be tied and forgotten. Perhaps on a Sunday afternoon the new
electronic scrolls are consulted and reviewed, but the information
contained therein seems wasted. Inaccessible to many. You either
cannot read it, or the documents are in the wrong place at the wrong
time.
E: So a great deal of
effort may be spent gathering facts, and once set to the plan they are
redundant. A waste of effort to be sure. You say the nurse focuses on
the individual. What grounds have you for this?
T: Individualised nursing
care is the bedrock of our practice. The nursing process is patient
centered?
E: Mm. Take me back to the
assessments. How do you know what to look for?
T: Models in the mind's
eye, help us to model the real world.
E: So the external world
is incomplete, as you have yet to recover the knowledge you were born
with.
T: Yes, that is so. But I
can use these models with supervision. There are many based on
Epictetus, Hippocrates, and others based on nurse teachers such as
Priam.
E: On the battlefield at
Marathon what assessments were used?
 |
T: We were forced to
act as Gods. Deciding quickly who might be saved, and who already
had a foot in Hades.
E: So Telemachus tell
me, do I have this right? There is a stage prior to assessment
cogitation let's say, when we decide what the mental approach will
be. What will be significant and what will not?
|
T: Yes. Just as you
suggest. As usual you are ahead of me. And I do not know where you are
heading.
E: Well let's see. On the
field of war all men are equal. Mortality stands by them all, either
as a shadow of panic, or a spear of courage to hurl at the enemy. What
I want to know is - how do we get from the army subject to triage, to
the cleric or philosopher in hospital with an individualised nursing
care plan?
T: The patient's needs are
identified, as noted earlier.
E: But that does not fully
answer the question. How are the needs identified?
T: From statements the
patient makes, observations and the physician's diagnosis.
|
E: So the nurses work
according to the dictum of the medics?
T: The physician's
diagnosis is important in terms of the nursing care to follow,
yes, but it is not definitive. The nurse also forms a series of
diagnoses.
E: How?
|
 |
T: The problems are
categorized, and that categorization is completed with the addition of
the nurse's personality, like a master navigator who 'knows' his
vessel and the waters, so the nurse 'knows' her patient and the course
to be run.
E: So sick nurses can
steer the troubled seas themselves? An interesting assumption. What
categories are used?
T: The first is physical.
Since to delay care of physical problems may threaten the patient's
life.
E:But surely they are
already categorized?
T: Sorry Epictetus, you
have lost me.
E: The location of the
hospital determines the problems the nurse will identify.
T: Yes, I see where you
are leading. After some thought the same principle applies even on the
battlefield. There we are not looking for appendicitis or tonsillitis.
E: But what of the
mentally ill? Are they not at risk of their lives?
T: Yes, but they are
mercifully a rarer occurrence than physical problems. Although exact
figures are hard to come by...
E: So proceed with the
categories.
T: The next are mental and
social. I suppose these three are the main categories.
E: So is the nursing
process applied to the individual?
T: Yes, it is.
E: But the nursing process
has distinct stages, which remain the same which ever individual they
are applied to?
T: It is the problems you
seek then. They are the key to the individualised care plan.
E: And on the battlefield
one model is applied to all.
T: Yes, I think so.
E: Can you summarize this
model?
 |
T: As I mentioned, the
first question is who have the Fates offered a chance of life to,
and who has already paid the ferryman. Next we ask who is
sensible, who movable, and so on. |
E: What
happens in the general hospital?
T: Why, we find general
problems. A host of problems from the man I described previously to
children, slaves and women.
E: So the models used in
the mind differ given the range of problems?
T: No. One model is
adopted across the ward.
E: What about the
patients' suitability to a particular model of nursing? Put trivially
this assumes that patients respond to surgical procedures in exactly
the same way. Do they - or might patient A's problems be better framed
in Hippocrates' model, while patient B is nursed using the Activities
of Living?
T: Yes, Epictetus, I see
now what you are driving at. Essentially we apply the nursing process
to the individual. The model of nursing on the other hand to a ward
population. I must ask if there are several models to be applied to
different patients on the same ward. Physical problems may be
essentially the same, but the patient's psychological response will
vary greatly. We may discern clear preordained pathways for physically
ill citizens, but those with mental health difficulties present
problems of granularity.
E: And does the presence
of uncertainty suggest anything to you?
T: It suggests that we do
not fully understand this concept of information. What is it? How do
we determine its value in health? Our lives are cloaked in
uncertainty. No actually it seems that life is shrouded in mystery,
when the Gods remove the shroud to give us life, we find that life and
health are themselves masked in uncertainty. Even when the Gods drape
that shroud at the end of our days, the uncertainty remains.
E: Unless sired by Zeus or
Odysseus a soldier does not leap from his mother's womb. He must be
nurtured, educated, and even question those values he is trained to
defend. For you and your nursing colleagues these questions and many
others must be answered before you can proceed with this codification
and your wider studies in informatics. Take heart. Before I take my
leave of you, as my primary pressure sore area confirms my age, tell
me what have you learned?
T: We have discussed the
subjects of nursing - the patients, and the way nursing is conducted.
Why things are done as they are. How is knowledge structured. Some
important questions have arisen. It has helped to identify the areas
that remain problematic.
E: Good. That's right. You
must understand how these key terms - 'data', 'information',
'knowledge', 'value' and 'context' are used, the wider nature of
health and nursing. Not forgetting this recording problem - just when
is a record complete?
T: Surely only when a
person dies can a record be said to be complete. If the managers want
their contract data so be it. But we must simultaneously capture
quality information, if they are to measure the art of health care.
This they must do if policies are really meant to secure quality
health care for our citizens. I certainly can't afford to pay Charon,
and besides the dead don't respond to audit proclamations.
E: You are making good
progress Telemachus. I must also say it seems that use of these
machines will teach us much about ourselves. All you have to do now is
prepare your arguments and convince your superiors. What will be your
main argument?
|
T: That they must know
exactly why they are creating data programs, coding nursing terms,
nurses must learn to constantly question claims for clinical
benefits. We have to realize that information is new as 'the'
economic resource. Benefits and solutions to our problems do not
flow from the very process of formalizing nursing itself. |
 |
© Peter Jones 1995
Citing this page:
Jones, P. (1995) Hodges' Health
Career - Care Domains - Model, Change:
<>,
Accessed
Suggested reading:
- Epictetus The Enchiridion
- Hospers John An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis, RKP, 1987
- Magee Brian Men of Ideas, Oxford, OUP, 1982 (Contemporary
philosophy)
- Magee Brian The Great Philosophers, BBC.
- Plato The Thaetetus
- Plato The Last Days of Socrates


|